Linguistic States Helped Strengthen Indian Unity
The Report of the States Reorganisation Commission (SRC) which was implemented on November 1, 1956, has helped transform the political and institutional life of the nation. The background to the SRC is as follows. In the 1920s, the Indian National Congress was reconstituted on linguistic lines. Its provincial units now followed the logic of language – one for Marathi speakers, another for Oriya speakers, etc. At the same time, Gandhi and other leaders promised their followers that when freedom came, the new nation would be based on a new set of provinces based on the principle of language. However, when India was finally freed in 1947, it was also divided. Now, when the proponents of linguistic states asked for this promise to be redeemed, the Congress hesitated. Partition was the consequence of intense attachment to one’s faith; how many more partitions would that other intense loyalty, language, lead to? So ran the thinking of the top Congress bosses including Nehru, Patel and Rajaji. However, the most militant protests ensued from the very large community of Telugu speakers. In October 1953, Potti Sriramulu, a former Gandhian, died seven weeks after beginning a fast unto death. Potti Sriramulu’s martyrdom provoked violent protests and led to the creation of the state of Andhra Pradesh. It also led to the formation of the SRC, which in 1956 put the formal, final seal of approval on the principle of linguistic states.
Why did top Congress leaders hesitate to form linguistic states after independence?
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 4
The correct answer is Option (4) → They feared it might create new divisions, similar to partition.
Option (1) They felt it would encourage foreign intervention. — Incorrect. The leaders’ worry was about India dividing from within; foreign powers play no part in their reasoning.
Option (2) They believed language was not important for identity. — Incorrect. They saw language as an intense loyalty, as strong as faith; that is why they feared it.
Option (3) They wanted to protect princely states. — Incorrect. Princely states have no place in their reasoning; their concern was language dividing the nation.
Option (4) They feared it might create new divisions, similar to partition. — Correct. Partition was the consequence of intense attachment to one’s faith; how many more partitions would language, that other intense loyalty, lead to? Many, including Prime Minister Nehru, feared that states based on language might hasten a further subdivision of India.
NCERT (2025-26): “Linguistic States Helped Strengthen Indian Unity … Partition was the consequence of intense attachment to one’s faith; how many more partitions would that other intense loyalty, language, lead to? So ran the thinking of the top Congress bosses including Nehru, Patel and Rajaji.…” “Linguistic States Helped Strengthen Indian Unity … In the early 1950s, many including Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru feared that states based on language might hasten a further subdivision of India.…” |