Read the passage and answer the question:

Furthermore, when we speak of threats to core values, how intense should the threats be? Surely there are big and small threats to virtually every value we hold dear. Can all those threats be brought into the understanding of security? Every time another country does something or fails to do something, this may damage the core values of one’s country. Every time a person is robbed in the streets, the security of ordinary people as they live their daily lives is har med. Yet, we would be paralyzed if we took such an extensive view of security: everywhere we looked, the world would be full of dangers. So we are brought to a conclusion: security relates only to extremely dangerous threats— threats that could so endanger core values that those values would be damaged beyond repair if we did not do something to deal with the situation.

What are the two groups in which the various notions of security are grouped?

Traditional and Non-Traditional

The correct answer is Option 1 - Traditional and Non-Traditional

The various notions of security are palced under two groups: traditional and non-traditional conceptions of security.