In the winter of 1946-47, a Communist member told the Constituent Assembly that there was no freedom in the country. On what main ground did he make this claim?
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 1
The correct answer is Option (1) → The final power still lay in British hands, backed by the British army and their economic hold
Option (1) The final power still lay in British hands, backed by the British army and their economic hold — Correct. Somnath Lahiri argued that the Assembly worked <strong>under the shadow of British guns</strong> and the British financial grip. So <strong>final power was still British</strong>, and the future was not in Indian hands.
Option (2) The Interim Government had refused to accept the Objectives Resolution moved by Jawaharlal Nehru — Incorrect. The Interim Government did not reject the Objectives Resolution. Lahiri, in fact, wanted the Interim Government to join the people in fighting British imperialism.
Option (3) The princely states had refused to send any representatives to the Constituent Assembly — Incorrect. The princely states were a real problem of the time, but Lahiri did not rest his claim on them. His point was British control over the Assembly.
Option (4) The Muslim League members had walked out of the Assembly and boycotted its sessions — Incorrect. Lahiri spoke of Indians fighting among themselves, but he did not base his claim on a League walk-out. He blamed British power for the lack of freedom.
NCERT (2026-27): “2.1 The will of the people … |