Coordination Compounds
Alfred Werner (1866-1919), a Swiss chemist was the first to formulate his ideas about the structures of coordination compounds. He prepared and characterised a large number of coordination compounds and studied their physical and chemical behaviour by simple experimental techniques. Werner proposed the concept of a primary valence and a secondary valence for a metal ion. The formulas and names adopted for coordination entities are based on the recommendations of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). Many approaches have been put forth to explain the nature of bonding in coordination compounds viz. Valence Bond Theory (VBT), Crystal Field Theory (CFT), Ligand Field Theory (LFT) and Molecular Orbital Theory (MOT). The Valence Bond Theory (VBT) explains with reasonable success, the formation, magnetic behaviour and geometrical shapes of coordination compounds. It, however, fails to provide a quantitative interpretation of magnetic behaviour and has nothing to say about the optical properties of these compounds. The Crystal Field Theory (CFT) to coordination compounds is based on the effect of different crystal fields (provided by the ligands taken as point charges), on the degeneracy of d orbital energies of the central metal atom/ion. The splitting of the d orbitals provides different electronic arrangements in strong and weak crystal fields. The treatment provides for quantitative estimations of orbital separation energies, magnetic moments and spectral and stability parameters. However, the assumption that ligands constitute point charges creates many theoretical difficulties.
The subscript ‘g’ is used in crystal field theory for complexes due to
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 2
The correct answer is Option (2) → Centre of symmetry
In crystal field theory, the split d orbitals are given symmetry labels. The subscript g comes from the German word gerade, meaning “even”. It is used for orbitals that stay the same when every point is reflected through the centre of symmetry (centre of inversion).
Octahedral complexes have a centre of symmetry at the metal, so the d orbitals split into t2g and eg sets.
So the subscript g is used because of the centre of symmetry.
Why the other options are incorrect
Option (1) lack of symmetry — Incorrect. Without a centre of symmetry the subscript g is dropped, as in tetrahedral complexes.
Option (3) Tetrahedral complexes — Incorrect. Tetrahedral complexes have no centre of symmetry, so their labels are t2 and e.
Option (4) Plane of symmetry — Incorrect. The subscript refers to inversion through a centre, not to reflection in a plane.
NCERT (2026-27 edition):
Crystal Field Theory – …

