In the case of general offer, there is no need for communicating acceptance to the offeror was held in: |
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1893) Balfour v. Balfour (1919) Durga Prasad v. Baldeo (1880) Timothy v. Mchill Water Heat Co. (1897) |
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1893) |
The correct answer is Option (1) → Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1893) Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1893): In this landmark case, the court held that a general offer can be accepted by anyone who performs the conditions of the offer, without the need for prior communication of acceptance to the offeror. The case involved a company that advertised a product claiming to prevent influenza and promised to pay £100 to anyone who contracted the disease after using it. When Mrs. Carlill used the product and still got sick, the court ruled in her favor, establishing that her use of the product constituted acceptance of the offer. Brief overview of the other cases:
|