Rapid Growth in urbanisation shows that cities act as magnet for rural population. Which of the following are reasons for flow of rural - to urban migration?
(A) Decline of Common property
(B) For clean environment
(C) Lack of Job opportunities
(D) Mass transit and mass communication
(E) Relative anonymity
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 2
The correct answer is Option (2) → (A), (C), (D), (E) only
(A) Decline of Common property Correct. The flow of rural-to-urban migration has been accelerated by the continuous decline of common property resources like ponds, forests and grazing lands. These had helped the poor survive in the villages, and without them their hardship increases.
(B) For clean environment Incorrect. Villagers go to the city for work and for social reasons; a cleaner environment is not what draws them to the swelling cities.
(C) Lack of Job opportunities Correct. Those who cannot find work (or sufficient work) in the rural areas go to the city in search of work, because opportunities for earning cash income are limited in the villages.
(D) Mass transit and mass communication Correct. Mass transit and mass communication are bridging the gap between the rural and urban areas. Travel to the city is easier, and the city and its life reach the village, so moving there is no longer a leap into the unknown.
(E) Relative anonymity Correct. The city may be preferred for social reasons, specially the relative anonymity it offers. It gives the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes some protection from the daily humiliation of the village, where everyone knows their caste identity.
NCERT (2025-26): “2.6 Rural-Urban Differences … Mass media and communication channels are now bringing images of urban life styles and patterns of consumption into the rural areas. Consequently, urban norms and standards are becoming well known even in the remote villages, creating new desires and aspirations for consumption. Mass transit and mass communication are bridging the gap between the rural and urban areas.…” “Considered from an urban point of view, the rapid growth in urbanisation shows that the town or city has been acting as a magnet for the rural population. Those who cannot find work (or sufficient work) in the rural areas go to the city in search of work. This flow of rural-to-urban migration has also been accelerated by the continuous decline of common property resources like ponds, forests and grazing lands. These common resources enabled poor people to survive in the villages although they owned little or no land. Now, these resources have been turned into private property, or they are exhausted (Ponds may run dry or no longer provide enough fish; forests may have been cut down and have vanished…). If people no longer have access to these resources, but on the other hand have to buy many things in the market that they used to get free (like fuel, fodder or supplementary food items), then their hardship increases. This hardship is worsened by the fact that opportunities for earning cash income are limited in the villages. Sometimes the city may also be preferred for social reasons, specially the relative anonymity it offers. The fact that urban life involves interaction with strangers can be an advantage for different reasons. For the socially oppressed groups like the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, this may offer some partial protection from the daily humiliation they may suffer in the village where everyone knows their caste identity. The anonymity of the city also allows the poorer sections of the socially dominant rural groups to engage in low status work that they would not be able to do in the village. All these reasons make the city an attractive destination for the villagers.…” |