Match List-I (Change in Green Revolution areas) with List-II (Group).
| List-I | List-II |
|---|---|
| (A) Introduction of tillers, tractors, threshers and harvesters displaced them | (I) Peasants |
| (B) Landowners began to cultivate land directly, which displaced them | (II) Medium and large farmers |
| (C) Primarily they were able to benefit from the new technology | (III) Service caste groups |
| (D) They produce primarily for themselves and not for the market | (IV) Tenant-cultivators |
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 1
The correct answer is Option (1) → A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I
| List-I | List-II | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| (A) Introduction of tillers, tractors, threshers and harvesters displaced them | (III) Service caste groups | Tillers, tractors, threshers and harvesters took over farm work once done by service caste groups. So these groups lost their place in village farming. |
| (B) Landowners began to cultivate land directly, which displaced them | (IV) Tenant-cultivators | Landowners found farming more profitable and took land back from their tenants to cultivate it directly. This pushed tenant-cultivators off the land. |
| (C) Primarily they were able to benefit from the new technology | (II) Medium and large farmers | The new inputs were expensive. Medium and large farmers could afford them, so they gained the most from the new technology. |
| (D) They produce primarily for themselves and not for the market | (I) Peasants | Agriculturists who produce mainly for their own needs and not for the market practise subsistence agriculture. They are called peasants. |
NCERT (2026-27): “4.3 The Green Revolution and its Social Consequences … “Thus, in the first phase of the Green Revolution, in the 1960s and 1970s, the introduction of new technology seemed to be increasing inequalities in rural society. Green Revolution crops were highly profitable, mainly because they yielded more produce. Well-to-do farmers who had access to land, capital, technology, and know-how, and those who could invest in the new seeds and fertilisers, could increase their production and earn more money. However, in many cases it led to the displacement of tenant-cultivators. For landowners began to take back land from their tenants and cultivate it directly because cultivation was becoming more profitable. This made the rich farmers better off, and worsened the condition of the landless and marginal holders.” “In addition, the introduction of machinery such as tillers, tractors, threshers, and harvesters (in areas such as Punjab and parts of Madhya Pradesh) led to the displacement of the service caste groups who used to carry out these agriculture-related activities. This process of displacement also increased the pace of rural-urban migration.” |