Which of the following best explains why urbanisation and the continuing political importance of rural areas are not contradictory developments? |
Urbanisation has reduced the demographic significance of villages. Economic influence has shifted mainly to metropolitan centres. Growth in urban populations has occurred alongside the continued electoral and political significance of rural populations. Rural areas contribute more to GDP than urban areas. |
Growth in urban populations has occurred alongside the continued electoral and political significance of rural populations. |
The correct answer is Option 3: Growth in urban populations has occurred alongside the continued electoral and political significance of rural populations. Urbanisation refers to the increasing share of the population living in towns and cities. However, this does not automatically reduce the political importance of rural areas. A large proportion of India's population still lives in villages, and rural voters continue to play a decisive role in elections and public policy. Therefore, rapid urban growth and strong rural political influence can coexist. |