In which case it was held by the Supreme Court of India that, "Mens rea by necessary implication can be excluded from a statute only where it is absolutely clear that the implementation of the Act would be defeated" ? |
State of Maharashtra Vs. Mayor Hans George Re Sreerangayee case Kunal Sethi Vs. State of Punjab Rupan Deol Bajaj's case |
State of Maharashtra Vs. Mayor Hans George |
The correct answer is Option (1) → State of Maharashtra Vs. Mayor Hans George State of Maharashtra v. Mayor Hans George : It was held in this case that, "Mens rea by necessary implication can be excluded from a statute only where it is absolutely clear that the implementation of the object of a statute would otherwise be defeated and its exclusion enables those put under strict liability by their act or omission to assist the promotion of the law." |