Choose the correct indirect transformation of the following sentence from the options given below:
Rahul said, "I must go now."
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 2
The correct answer is Option (2) → Rahul said that he must go then.
| Direct | Indirect |
|---|---|
| Rahul said, "I must go now." | Rahul said that he must go then. |
Statement in indirect speech:
- Reporting verb: "said" (with no object) stays "said", and that joins the reported statement; the inverted commas are dropped.
- Tense change: must (necessity) has no past form of its own, so it usually stays must (it may also become "had to").
- Pronoun changes: "I" → he (Rahul, the speaker).
- Words of nearness (time and place): "now" → then.
- Other standard changes: is/am → was, do/does → did, will → would, can → could, may → might, has/have → had, here → there, today → that day, tomorrow → the next day.
Example: She said, "I must leave now." → She said that she must leave then.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect?
Option 1: Rahul said he has to go then. — Incorrect. "has to" is present tense; after the past reporting verb "said", must stays must or becomes had to.
Option 3: Rahul said that he must go now. — Incorrect. "now" is not changed to "then"; words of nearness change in indirect speech.
Option 4: Rahul said that he should be going then. — Incorrect.
- "should" (advisability) changes the meaning of must (necessity).
- The continuous form "be going" is not in the original.
Contrast: "must" can stay unchanged after "said", but the time word "now" changes to "then".