Target Exam

CUET

Subject

Chemistry

Chapter

Inorganic: Coordination Compounds

Question:

Which of the following is not a limitation of valence bond theory (VBT)?

Options:

It does not distinguish between weak and strong ligands.

It does not explain the color exhibited by the coordination complex.

It does not explain the concept of the high spin and low spin complex.

It does not give predictions regarding the tetrahedral and square plane complex in coordination number 4.

Correct Answer:

It does not explain the concept of the high spin and low spin complex.

Explanation:

The correct answer is Option (3) → It does not explain the concept of the high spin and low spin complex.

Note: The given answer is as per NTA. However,the correct answer should be Option 4 "It does not give predictions regarding the tetrahedral and square plane complex in coordination number 4" as explained below:

 

Valence Bond Theory was one of the first theories to explain bonding in coordination compounds, but it has several well-known drawbacks. To find the correct answer, we must distinguish between what VBT failed to do and what it actually did.

 

Option 4 is not a limitation: VBT is able to provide predictions regarding geometry for coordination number 4. By looking at the hybridization, VBT predicts:

  • Tetrahedral geometry for $sp^3$ hybridization.

  • Square planar geometry for $dsp^2$ hybridization.

    Since the theory provides a mechanism to predict these shapes, stating that it "does not give predictions" is factually incorrect. Therefore, this statement is not a limitation of the theory.

  • Option 1 (Weak vs. Strong Ligands): This is a major limitation. VBT cannot explain why certain ligands cause pairing (strong field) while others do not (weak field). This was later explained by Crystal Field Theory (CFT).

  • Option 2 (Color): VBT is a static model that focuses on orbital overlap. It does not account for the electronic transitions between $d$-orbitals that result in the characteristic colors of complexes.

  • Option 3 (High Spin vs. Low Spin):. In the NCERT list of limitations for Valence Bond Theory (VBT), it explicitly states:

  • "It does not explain the concepts of low spin and high spin complexes."

    While VBT uses the terms "inner orbital" (e.g., $d^2sp^3$) and "outer orbital" (e.g., $sp^3d^2$) to describe complexes, it does so after knowing the magnetic data. It cannot predict why a specific metal-ligand combination chooses to be high spin or low spin. It doesn't have a theoretical reason for the energy difference between these states.

.