A historian studying Mughal revenue records notes down four practices. With reference to the ways of collecting revenue in kind described in the Ain, which one is the odd one out?
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 4
The correct answer is Option (4) → Surveying cultivation village by village and peasant-wise before assessing the jama
Option (1) Estimating the grain and, in case of doubt, estimating the cut crop in three lots — Incorrect. This is <strong>kankut</strong>, where the grain was estimated. It is one of the Ain's ways of taking revenue <strong>in kind</strong>.
Option (2) Reaping and stacking the crops and dividing them by agreement before the parties — Incorrect. This is <strong>batai</strong>, also called bhaoli. The harvested crop itself was shared, so revenue was taken in kind.
Option (3) Dividing the fields between the parties after they have been sown — Incorrect. This is <strong>khet-batai</strong>. The sown fields were divided, which is again a way of collecting in kind.
Option (4) Surveying cultivation village by village and peasant-wise before assessing the jama — Correct. The other three are the Ain's methods of <strong>collecting revenue in kind</strong>. This one is different: Aurangzeb's order of 1665 asked amins to survey <strong>actual conditions of cultivation</strong> before fixing the jama, which is a way of assessing revenue.
NCERT (2026-27): “6. Land Revenue System … “This is an excerpt from Aurangzeb’s order to his revenue official, 1665: He should direct the amins f the parganas that they should discover the actual conditions of cultivation (maujudat), village by village, peasant-wise (asamiwar), and after minute scrutiny, assess the jama, keeping in view the financial interests (kifayat) of the government, and the welfare of the peasantry.” |