Read the following passage and answer the question.
The era of exclusivity has come to an end. We are now in an age of inclusion - a pivotal moment in human history. The new era is one in which we learn to reverberate together with the existential truth of unity and connectivity of all life.
Sanatan Dharma is an eternal law, and is India's great contribution to humanity. But no law can be eternal without being absolutely inclusive. Celebrating exclusivity in any form is a terrible desecration of this law. Living in inclusiveness is to recognise how vital every being, every stone, every microbial life, every speck of soil, is to our well being and to the various kaleidoscope of existence. As I write this, a grasshopper is crawling over my foot. I could put it back where it belongs in the garden. But if I decided to eliminate it, I would have eliminated one more foundation stone of our very existence.
Maha Akhand Bharat is an offering of this subcontinent's great vision of inclusiveness to the entire world. It is about raising individual consciousness beyond physical boundaries, and raise collective consciousness beyond national boundaries. As our country takes on the presidency for G20 this year, we are in a position to offer the planet a new template for world leadership based on inclusiveness, not dominance.
A Conscious Planet - its time has come. Let us make it happen.
As per the author, inclusiveness in India will bring the entire world into one by -
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 1
The correct answer is Option (1) → raising the consciousness beyond physical boundaries
The third paragraph says the vision of inclusiveness offered to the entire world "is about raising individual consciousness beyond physical boundaries".
Why the Other Options are Incorrect?
Option 2: raising collectiveness beyond physical boundaries — Incorrect. Misread: the passage speaks of raising collective consciousness beyond national boundaries; "collectiveness beyond physical boundaries" mixes the two phrases and is not what the author says.
Option 3: raising a wall along boundaries — Incorrect. Contradicted: a wall divides people, against the inclusiveness the author praises.
Option 4: raising the voice near boundaries — Incorrect. Not mentioned: the passage says nothing about raising one's voice; the author speaks of raising consciousness.