Following question consists of a statement and arguments I and II. Answer the question by choosing correct options mentioned below after statement and arguments.

Statement : Ragging in colleges is a good practice.

Arguments : I. Yes, A sensible ragging helps the college boys to step into manhood and teaches them to take trifles in a good humour.

II. No, the tortures inflicted in name of ragging and the humilation suffered by young boys and girls often o beyond limits.

Both I and II are strong

Argument I: "Yes, A sensible ragging helps the college boys to step into manhood and teaches them to take trifles in a good humour."

This argument is flawed because it assumes that ragging is always "sensible" and that it has a positive impact on the individuals involved. In reality, ragging can be harmful and traumatic, and it's not a valid way to teach people to take things in a good humor.

Argument II: "No, the tortures inflicted in name of ragging and the humiliation suffered by young boys and girls often go beyond limits."

This argument is strong because it highlights the potential harm and cruelty that can occur during ragging. It's a realistic concern that needs to be addressed.

Both arguments are relevant, but Argument II is stronger because it focuses on the potential harm and cruelty that can occur during ragging, which is a valid concern.

Argument I is flawed because it assumes that ragging is always positive and helpful, which is not necessarily true.

Thus, "Both I and II are strong" is correct.