Choose the correct indirect transformation of the following sentence…

The correct answer is Option (4) → Avik warned Sumit not to come there again or he would get a beating.

Direct to indirect speech (a command given as a warning):

Change	Direct	Indirect	Why
Reporting verb	said to	warned	“Said to” changes to a verb that shows the speaker’s purpose. Avik threatens Sumit with a beating, so the verb is warned.
Negative command	Do not come	not to come	“Do not come” becomes not to come (not + to-infinitive).
Words of nearness (time and place)	here	there	“Here” becomes there.
Pronoun change	you	he	“You” (Sumit) becomes he.
Tense change	will get	would get	After the past reporting verb, “will get” becomes would get.
Full sentence	Avik said to Sumit, “Do not come here again or you will get a beating.”	Avik warned Sumit not to come there again or he would get a beating.

Example: The teacher said to us, “Do not talk.” → The teacher told us not to talk.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect?

Option 1: Avik told Sumit to do not come there again or he will get a beating. — Incorrect.

• "To do not come" is not English. The negative form is "not to come".
• "Will" is not changed to "would".

Option 2: Avik threatened Sumit that do not come there again or he will be beaten. — Incorrect.

• A command cannot follow "that" in its direct form ("that do not come").
• "Will" is not changed to "would", and "will be beaten" alters the original words.

Option 3: Avik told Sumit to not come there again or he will be getting a beating. — Incorrect.

• The usual reported form is "not to come", not "to not come".
• "Will be getting" changes the tense instead of shifting "will get" to "would get".