Choose the correct indirect transformation of the following sentence…

The correct answer is Option (4) → Avik warned Sumit not to come there again or he would get a beating.

Direct to indirect speech (a command given as a warning):

• Reporting verb: "said to" changes to a verb that shows the speaker's purpose. Avik threatens Sumit with a beating, so the verb is warned.
• Negative command: "Do not come" becomes not to come (not + to-infinitive).
  Example: The teacher said to us, "Do not talk." → The teacher told us not to talk.
• Words of nearness (time and place): "here" becomes there.
• Pronoun changes: "you" (Sumit) becomes he.
• Tense change: after the past reporting verb, "will get" becomes would get.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect?

Option 1: Avik told Sumit to do not come there again or he will get a beating. — Incorrect.

• "To do not come" is not English; the negative form is "not to come".
• "Will" is not changed to "would".

Option 2: Avik threatened Sumit that do not come there again or he will be beaten. — Incorrect.

• A command cannot follow "that" in its direct form ("that do not come").
• "Will" is not changed to "would", and "will be beaten" alters the original words.

Option 3: Avik told Sumit to not come there again or he will be getting a beating. — Incorrect.

• The usual reported form is "not to come", not "to not come".
• "Will be getting" changes the tense instead of shifting "will get" to "would get".