Assertion: In ancient India 'kanyadana' or the gift of a daughter in marriage was an important religious duty of the father. |
Both the Assertion and the Reason are correct and the Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion. Both the Assertion and the Reason are correct but the Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion. The Assertion is incorrect but the Reason is correct. The Assertion is correct but the Reason is incorrect. |
Both the Assertion and the Reason are correct and the Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion. |
In ancient India, the role of sons was crucial for the continuity of the patrilineage, whereas daughters were perceived differently within this societal structure. Unlike sons, daughters did not hold any claims to the household's resources. However, marrying daughters into families outside their own kin was considered desirable, following the practice known as exogamy, or marrying outside one's social group. Consequently, the lives of young girls and women from high-status families were carefully regulated to ensure they were married at the appropriate time and to suitable partners. |