Which of the following is NOT cited as a reasoning by the economists which prevented successful implementation of poverty alleviation programmes in India?. |
Due to unequal distribution of land and other assets, the benefits from direct poverty alleviation programmes have been appropriated by the non-poor. Compared to the magnitude of poverty, the amount of resources allocated for these programmes is not sufficient. Government and bank officials who are responsible for implementing such programmes are ill motivated, inadequately trained, corruption prone and vulnerable to pressure from a variety of local elites There is participation of local level institutions in programme implementation. |
There is participation of local level institutions in programme implementation. |
The correct answer is Option 4: There is participation of local level institutions in programme implementation. In fact, the involvement of local level institutions is often seen as a positive factor in program implementation, as it can help to ensure that programs are tailored to local needs and are more likely to be sustainable. "Scholars, while assessing poverty alleviation programmes, state three major areas of concern which prevent their successful implementation. Due to unequal distribution of land and other assets, the benefits from direct poverty alleviation programmes have been appropriated by the non-poor. Compared to the magnitude of poverty, the amount of resources allocated for these programmes is not sufficient. Moreover, these programmes depend mainly on government and bank officials for their implementation. Since such officials are ill motivated, inadequately trained, corruption prone and vulnerable to pressure from a variety of local elites, the resources are inefficiently used and wasted. There is also non-participation of local level institutions in programme implementation." |