Read the passage and answer the questions given below it.
The bridge I glued together from ice-cream sticks in Class 11 held fourteen kilograms before it cracked, and I was prouder of the crack than of the number. It split exactly where my calculations had said it would. For a week, I was certain I would be an engineer.
Over the Diwali break I redrew the menu card of the dhaba near our colony, for nothing, because the old one used four fonts and a clip-art chilli. The owner pinned it up. Nobody remarked on it. But he told me, a little puzzled, that fewer people now asked him what the dishes were. I found that oddly moving, as no load test had been.
People who mean well tell me to pick the safe one. I find that advice facile. Engineering is hardly safe for someone who would be mediocre at it, and design is not frivolous merely because its results are hard to measure. What separates the two, for me, is the kind of wrong I can live with. In engineering, a mistake announces itself: the beam gives way, the code refuses to run. In design, I could be wrong for years and only half suspect it. That ambiguity unsettles me more than any entrance exam.
My physics teacher says that good engineers are designers who have agreed to be checked. A designer at a college open day claimed nearly the opposite: she had trained as a mechanical engineer, then spent ten years unlearning the urge to be sure. I copied both remarks inside my rough notebook. They do not cancel out. The application form closes in three weeks, and I have filled in every box except the one for the course.
Which of the following is the most suitable title for the passage?
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 2
The correct answer is Option (2) → Two Kinds of Being Wrong
The title names the idea that sits at the centre of the writer’s choice.
- The writer says what separates the two fields is “the kind of wrong I can live with”.
- In engineering, a mistake shows itself at once. In design, one can be wrong for years without being sure.
- The bridge, the menu card and the two remarks in the notebook all lead to this one comparison.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect?
Option 1: Leaving Engineering Behind for Design — Incorrect. Contradicted: The writer has not left engineering. The box for the course is still empty at the end.
Option 3: The Bridge That Held Fourteen Kilograms — Incorrect. Too narrow: The bridge appears only in the first paragraph. It is one memory, not the subject of the passage.
Option 4: Choosing a Career in India Today — Incorrect. Too broad: The passage is about one student and two fields. It says nothing about careers in India in general.