The ADR method are speedier, informal and cheaper modes of dispensing justice when compared to the conventional judicial procedure. ADR provides a more convenient forum to the parties who can choose the time, place and procedure for conducting the preferred dispute redressal process. Further more, if the dispute is technical in nature, parties have an opportunity to select the expert who possesses the relevant legal and technical expertise. It is interesting to note that ADR provides flexibility to even refer disputes to Non-lawyers.

Alternate Dispute resolution, particularly Arbitration has several advantages in legal system of India. Which of the following is an advantage?

Assistance in reducing pendency of cases in Indian Courts

The correct answer is Option (1) → Assistance in reducing pendency of cases in Indian Courts

Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), particularly arbitration, has been instrumental in reducing the overwhelming backlog of cases in Indian courts. By providing a faster and more efficient means of resolving disputes, ADR has helped alleviate the burden on the judiciary and improved access to justice.

Option 2: Aided the unwanted delay in litigation: This is incorrect because ADR is designed to reduce delays in litigation. Arbitration, in particular, often has faster timelines than traditional court proceedings.

Option 3: Need of influx of more judges in the legal system: ADR actually helps to reduce the need for more judges. By resolving disputes outside of the court system, ADR frees up judges to handle more complex or urgent cases.

Option 4: Economic growth of the country: While ADR can contribute to economic growth indirectly by reducing legal costs and improving business efficiency, it is not a direct driver of economic growth. Economic growth is influenced by a variety of factors, such as investment, productivity, and government policies.