Sudhir takes away the jewellery from the showroom without purchasing it with the intention of showing it to his wife. He was accused of theft. He alleged that he was not aware of the fact that what he did was a crime and is penalised under the law. The court said that he would still be penalised because:

Ignorantia Facti Excusat - Ignorantia Juris Non-Excusat

The correct answer is Option (3) → Ignorantia Facti Excusat - Ignorantia Juris Non-Excusat