Statement I: Cu is less reactive than hydrogen. Statement II: \(E_{Cu^{2+}/Cu}\) is negative. |
Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II is not a correct explanation of Statement I Statement I is correct but Statement II is false Statement I is false but Statement II is correct |
Statement I is correct but Statement II is false |
The correct answer is option 3. Statement I is correct but Statement II is false. Let us delve into both the statements and their implications: Statement I: Cu is less reactive than hydrogen Statement I is correct because copper is indeed less reactive than hydrogen. In the reactivity series of metals, copper \((Cu)\) is placed below hydrogen. This means copper is less reactive than hydrogen. A more reactive metal can displace a less reactive metal from its compounds. Since copper cannot displace hydrogen from acids (such as \(HCl\) or \(H_2SO_4\)), it shows that copper is less reactive than hydrogen. Metals with more positive standard electrode potentials are less reactive because they have a greater tendency to gain electrons. Copper has a more positive electrode potential compared to hydrogen, reinforcing its lower reactivity. Statement II: \(E^\circ_{Cu^{2+}/Cu}\) is negative Statement II is false because the standard electrode potential for the copper(II)/copper couple is positive, not negative. The standard reduction potential for the reaction \(Cu^{2+} + 2e^- \rightarrow Cu\) is +0.34 V. This positive value indicates that \(Cu^{2+}\) ions are more likely to gain electrons and be reduced to metallic copper. A negative \(E^\circ\) would imply that the reduction of \(Cu^{2+}\) to Cu is not favorable under standard conditions, which is not the case. The positive electrode potential shows that the reduction is thermodynamically favorable. |