How did the leaders of the movement in Jharkhand respond to the nationalisation of forest produce?
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 1
The correct answer is Option (1) → They boycotted it
Option (1) They boycotted it — Correct. The nationalisation of forest produce was one of the issues the Jharkhand leaders agitated against, and they boycotted it. A boycott means refusing to accept or take part in something.
Option (2) They held it up and closed down camps — Incorrect. Holding up work and closing down camps was how they opposed the survey and settlement operations. That belongs to a different issue from forest produce.
Option (3) They demanded a share of its revenue — Incorrect. The leaders did not seek a share of forest revenue. They rejected the nationalisation itself by boycotting it.
Option (4) They challenged it through petitions in court — Incorrect. Court petitions are not among the methods recorded for this movement. It used direct action, such as boycotts, resisting dues and halting survey camps.
NCERT (2026-27): “Jharkhand … “acquisition of land for large irrigation projects and firing ranges; survey and settlement operations, which were held up, camps closed down, etc. collection of loans, rent and cooperative dues, which were resisted; nationalisation of forest produce which they boycotted” |