Deccan peasants feared the written word and did not know the clauses inserted in the bonds. Why did they still sign them?
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 4
The correct answer is Option (4) → Moneylenders were unwilling to give loans without legal bonds
Option (1) The Collector ordered the ryots to register their loans in writing — Incorrect. The bonds were demanded by moneylenders as a condition for lending. The ryots signed them to get loans.
Option (2) Bonds protected the ryots from the rising revenue demand — Incorrect. Bonds were loan papers and gave no shield against revenue. Peasants saw them as symbols of an oppressive system.
Option (3) The village panchayat refused to settle oral loan disputes — Incorrect. Village disputes are not the reason. Without a bond the ryot could get no loan from the moneylender.
Option (4) Moneylenders were unwilling to give loans without legal bonds — Correct. To survive, the ryots needed loans, and moneylenders would not lend without legal bonds. So the peasants had no choice but to sign.
NCERT (2026-27): “3.6 The experience of injustice … |