\(E_{cell}\) for the given cell
\(Pt(s)|Br_2(l)|Br^- (0.1\, \ M)||Cl^- (0.01\, \ M)| Cl_2(g)(1\, \ atm)| Pt(s)\)
[Given: \(E^o_{Br_2/Br^-} = +1.09 V\), \(E^o_{Cl_2/Cl^-} = +1.36 V\)] at 298 K is
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 4
The correct answer is option 4. 2109 V.
The given cell is
\(Pt(s)|Br_2(l)|Br^- (0.1\, \ M)||Cl^- (0.01\, \ M)| Cl_2(g)(1\, \ atm)| Pt(s)\)
The given reduction potentials are
\(E^o_{Br_2/Br^-} = +1.09 V\)
\(E^o_{Cl_2/Cl^-} = +1.36 V\)
Oxidation half reaction: \(Br_2(l) + 2e^- \longrightarrow 2Br^- (aq)\) (At anode)
Reduction half reaction: \(Cl_2(l) + 2e^- \longrightarrow 2Cl^- (aq)\) (At cathode)
\(∴ E^o_{cell} = E^o_{reduction} - E^o_{oxidation}\)
or, \(E^o_{cell} = E^o_{Cl_2/Cl^-} - E^o_{Br_2/Br^-}\)
or, \(E^o_{cell} = 1.36 - (+1.09)\)
or, \(E^o_{cell} = +0.27V\)
From the half reaction it is clear the value of \(n = 2\)
We know, Nernst equation is
\(E_{cell} = E^o_{cell} - \frac{0.0591}{2}log Q\)
or, \(E_{cell} = E^o_{cell} - \frac{0.0591}{2}log \frac{[Br^-]^2}{[Cl^-]^2}\)
or, \(E_{cell} = E^o_{cell} - \frac{0.0591}{2}log \frac{[0.1]^2}{[0.01]^2}\)
or, \(E_{cell} = E^o_{cell} - \frac{0.0591}{2}log \frac{0.01}{0.0001}\)
or, \(E_{cell} = E^o_{cell} - \frac{0.0591}{2}log(100)\)
or, \(E_{cell} = E^o_{cell} - \frac{0.0591}{2} × 2\)
or, \(E_{cell} = +0.27 - 0.0591\)
\(∴ E_{cell} = + 0.2109 V\)