Target Exam

CUET

Subject

Psychology

Chapter

Variations in Psychological Attributes

Question:

Assertion: Naturalistic intelligence involves the ability to recognize the beauty of different species of flora and fauna.

Reasoning: Hunters, farmers, tourists, botanists, zoologists, and bird watchers possess more of naturalistic intelligence.

Options:

Both Assertion and Reasoning are true, and the Reasoning is the correct explanation of the Assertion.

Both Assertion and Reasoning are true, but the Reasoning is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.

Assertion is true, but the Reasoning is false.

Assertion is false, but the Reasoning is true.

Correct Answer:

Both Assertion and Reasoning are true, but the Reasoning is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.

Explanation:

The correct answer is Option 2: Both Assertion and Reasoning are true, but the Reasoning is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.

Assertion: Naturalistic intelligence involves the ability to recognize the beauty of different species of flora and fauna. This is correct. Naturalistic intelligence refers to the ability to recognize, classify, and appreciate patterns in nature, such as different species of plants and animals. People strong in this intelligence often notice details in the natural world.

Reasoning: Hunters, farmers, tourists, botanists, zoologists, and bird watchers possess more of naturalistic intelligence. It is also true.  This statement correctly identifies the groups of people who typically exhibit high levels of naturalistic intelligence. These individuals possess an "environmentalist" perspective, allowing them to effectively interact with and understand their surroundings.

Relationship Analysis: While both statements are factually correct, the Reasoning is not the logical explanation for the Assertion. The Assertion defines a cognitive/aesthetic skill (the ability to recognize beauty), whereas the Reasoning provides examples of people who possess the intelligence. The existence of these professionals does not explain why or how the intelligence involves the recognition of flora and fauna; it merely proves that such intelligence exists in certain roles.