The Act that revised and strengthened the legal provision punishing acts of violence or humiliation against Dalits and Adivasis is called:
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 2
The correct answer is Option (2) → The Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
Option (2) The Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Correct. The 1989 Prevention of Atrocities Act revised and strengthened the legal provisions punishing acts of violence or humiliation against Dalits and adivasis. That such laws had to be passed again and again shows that the law alone cannot end a social practice.
NCERT (2025-26): “State and Non-State Initiatives Addressing Caste and Tribe Discrimination … In addition to reservations, there have been a number of laws passed to end, prohibit and punish caste discrimination, specially untouchability. One of the earliest such laws was the Caste Disabilities Removal Act of 1850, which disallowed the curtailment of rights of citizens due solely to change of religion or caste. The most recent such law was the Constitution Amendment (Ninety Third Amendment) Act of 2005, which became law on 23rd January 2006. Coincidentally, both the 1850 law and the 2006 amendment related to education. The 93rd Amendment is for introducing reservation for the Other Backward Classes in institutions of higher education, while the 1850 Act was used to allow entry of Dalits to government schools. In between, there have been numerous laws, of which the important ones are, of course, the Constitution of India itself, passed in 1950; and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act of 1989. The Constitution abolished untouchability (Article 17) and introduced the reservation provisions mentioned above. The 1989 Prevention of Atrocities Act revised and strengthened the legal provisions punishing acts of violence or humiliation against Dalits and adivasis. The fact that legislation was passed repeatedly on this subject is proof of the fact that the law alone cannot end a social practice.…” |