Which of the following are true combinations?
A. Maneka Gandhi case - interpretation of due process of law
B. Tara Singh case - legal aid privilege rather than duty
C. M.H. Hoskot case - intricacies of Adversarial System
D. Keshavanand Bharti case-free legal aid to women
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 3
The correct answer is Option (3) → A, B, C only
Explanation:
- A. Maneka Gandhi case - interpretation of due process of law: True. This landmark case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21, emphasizing due process.
- B. Tara Singh case - legal aid privilege rather than duty: True. The Tara Singh case highlighted the necessity of legal aid but did not impose it as an obligation.
- C. M.H. Hoskot case - intricacies of Adversarial System: True. This case addressed the complexities and rights involved in the adversarial legal system, particularly regarding legal representation.
- D. Keshavanand Bharti case - free legal aid to women: False. The Keshavanand Bharati case primarily dealt with the Basic Structure Doctrine and did not focus on free legal aid for women.