Assertion : In the past, famines were a major and recurring source of increased mortality. |
Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A. Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A A is false R is true A is true R is false. |
Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A |
The correct answer is Option 2: Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A Assertion : In the past, famines were a major and recurring source of increased mortality. This is correct. Historically, famines were a primary driver of high mortality rates. Before modern transportation and global trade, a local crop failure often meant mass starvation because food could not be moved quickly from surplus areas to deficit areas. Does R explains A? No The Assertion talks about famines being a major and recurring source of increased mortality — that is, why deaths rose during famines. The Reason, however, primarily explains why famines occurred (due to poverty, malnutrition, and rainfall vulnerability). It focuses on the causes of famine, not directly on why mortality increased during famines (such as starvation, disease, weak relief systems, etc.). Although poverty and malnutrition do make populations more vulnerable to death during famines, the Reason as worded mainly addresses the origin of famines, not the mechanism of increased mortality. Therefore, it does not directly explain the Assertion. The correct reason would be: Famines caused increased mortality because extreme food scarcity led to widespread starvation and lowered immunity, making impoverished populations highly susceptible to opportunistic diseases and epidemics, while the lack of rapid transport prevented life-saving food distribution from other regions |