Why are most Asian cultures characterised as collectivistic? |
The boundary between self and others is relatively fixed. The boundary between self and others is shifting thus at times fusing with the cosmos and at other times full withdrawn. Clear dichotomies between man and nature. The self and the group exist as two different entities remaining at a distance. |
The boundary between self and others is shifting thus at times fusing with the cosmos and at other times full withdrawn. |
The correct answer is Option (2) → The boundary between self and others is shifting thus at times fusing with the cosmos and at other times full withdrawn.
"In the Western culture, the self and the group exist as two different entities with clearly defined boundaries. Individual members of the group maintain their individuality. In the Indian culture, the self is generally not separated from one’s own group; rather both remain in a state of harmonious co-existence. In the Western culture, on the other hand, they often remain at a distance. That is why many Western cultures are characterised as individualistic, whereas many Asian cultures are characterised as collectivistic." |