Assertion: Some Historians feel that land grants were part of a strategy adopted by ruling lineages in earlier times to extend agriculture to new areas.

Reason: Some historians feel that land grants were indicative of weakening political power. As kings were losing control over their Samantas, they tried to win allies by making grants of land.

Both the Assertion and the Reason are correct but the Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.

The correct answer is Option 2 - Both the Assertion and the Reason are correct but the Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.

Assertion: Some Historians feel that land grants were part of a strategy adopted by ruling lineages in earlier times to extend agriculture to new areas. (Correct)

Reason: Some historians feel that land grants were indicative of weakening political power. As kings were losing control over their Samantas, they tried to win allies by making grants of land. (Correct)

Historians hold differing viewpoints on the impact of land grants. Some argue that they were part of a strategy adopted by ruling lineages to expand agriculture into new territories. On the other hand, some believe that land grants indicate a decline in political power, as kings sought to gain allies by granting land to others when losing control over their samantas (feudal lords). It is suggested that, as a façade of power, kings attempted to present themselves as supermen, particularly as their control was waning.
While land grants shed light on the relationship between cultivators and the state, certain groups, such as pastoralists, fisherfolk, hunter-gatherers, mobile or semi-sedentary artisans, and shifting cultivators, were often beyond the reach of officials or samantas. These groups did not maintain detailed records of their lives and transactions, which makes understanding their historical context more challenging.