Read the following passage and answer questions.
India has never subscribed to the doctrine of militarism and war in her history. Here war was never treated as an ideal. It was only tolerated as unavoidable and inevitable and all attempts were made to check it and bring it under control. Inspite of the frequency of wars in ancient India, inspite of highly developed military organisation, techniques of war and imperialism and inspite of the open justification of war as national policy, the heart of India loved pacifism as an ideal capable of realisation. India's symbolic role was that of a peacemaker and it sincerely pinned its faith on the principle of "Live and let live". At least philosophically, India's intelligencia supported the cause of peace not only in national affairs but international affairs also. All the great seers of yore visualised the unity of life permeating all beings, animate or inanimate, which ruled out killing and suicidal wars.
This doctrine of philosophical pacifisms was practiced by ancient Aryans and is no doubt a question of a controversial nature. Certainly, the great Indian teachers and savants stuck to this doctrine tenaciously and in their personal life they translated it into practice and preached it to masses and even to princes of military classes.
Another culture of those times, the existence of which has been proved by the excavations of Mohan-jo-Daro, also enunciated the doctrine of pacifism and friendship to all. Strangely enough the Indus Valley civilisation has revealed no fortification and very few weapons.
Ahimsa or the doctrine of non-violence in thought, speech and action assumed a gigantic importance in the Buddhist and Jain period. By a constant practice of this virtue, man becomes unassailable by even wild beasts who forget their ferocity the moment they enter the circumference of his magnetic influence. The monks and nuns of these churches were apostles of peace who reached every nook and corner of the world and delivered the message of love to war-weary humanity. The greatest votary was the royal monk Ashoka who in reality was responsible for transforming Ahimsa as an act of personal virtue to Ahimsa as an act of national virtue.
Choose the correct answer from options given below.
Principle of 'Live and Let Live' means:
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 4
The correct answer is Option (4) → Wanting peaceful relations with others; neither interfering nor brooking any interference.
"Live and let live" means living one's own life peacefully and allowing others to live theirs in their own way. The passage presents India as a peacemaker that pinned its faith on this principle. To brook means to tolerate or allow; so "neither interfering nor brooking any interference" means neither meddling in others' affairs nor allowing others to meddle in one's own.
Example: The two neighbours never quarrel; they believe in live and let live.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect?
Option 1: Having an imperialistic attitude — Incorrect. Opposite meaning: an imperialistic attitude is the wish to conquer and rule other countries, which is the opposite of letting others live in peace.
Option 2: Willing to be led by military leaders — Incorrect. Wrong meaning: the principle is about peace with others, not about military leadership.
Option 3: Frequently attacking other nations — Incorrect. Opposite meaning: attacking others is the reverse of letting them live.