Practicing Success

Target Exam

CUET

Subject

History

Chapter

Medieval India: Peasants, Zamindars and the State

Question:

Match List I with List II. 

LIST I
Officer

LIST II
Duty

 A. Amil Guzar  

 I. Accountant

 B. Mandal

 II. Revenue Collector

 C. Patwari

 III. Village Headman

 D. Diwan

 IV. Supervisor of the Fiscal System  

Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Options:

A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I

A-II, B-IV, C-I, D-III

A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV

A-II, B-III, C-I, D-IV

Correct Answer:

A-II, B-III, C-I, D-IV

Explanation:

The correct answer is Option (4) → A-II, B-III, C-I, D-IV

 

Correct Match:

LIST I
Officer

LIST II
Duty

 A. Amil Guzar  

 II. Revenue Collector

 B. Mandal

 III. Village Headman

 C. Patwari

 I. Accountant

 D. Diwan

 IV. Supervisor of the Fiscal System  

Explanation:

Land Revenue System under the Mughals:

Revenue from the land was the economic mainstay of the Mughal Empire. It was therefore vital for the state to create an administrative apparatus to ensure control over agricultural production, and to fix and collect revenue from across the length and breadth of the rapidly expanding empire. This apparatus included the office (daftar) of the (D) diwan who was responsible for supervising the fiscal system of the empire. Thus revenue officials and record keepers penetrated the agricultural domain and became a decisive agent in shaping agrarian relations.

The Mughal state tried to first acquire specific information about the extent of the agricultural lands in the empire and what these lands produced before fixing the burden of taxes on people. The land revenue arrangements consisted of two stages – first, assessment and then actual collection. The jama was the amount assessed, as opposed to hasil, the amount collected. In his list of duties of the (A) amil-guzar or revenue collector, Akbar decreed that while he should strive to make cultivators pay in cash, the option of payment in kind was also to be kept open. While fixing revenue, the attempt of the state was to maximise its claims. The scope of actually realising these claims was, however, sometimes thwarted by local conditions.

Panchayats and headmen in Village Communities in the 16th-17th century (India):

The village panchayat was an assembly of elders, usually important people of the village with hereditary rights over their property. In mixed-caste villages, the panchayat was usually a heterogeneous body. An oligarchy, the panchayat represented various castes and communities in the village, though the village menial-cum-agricultural worker was unlikely to be represented there. The decisions made by these panchayats were binding on the members.

The panchayat was headed by a headman known as muqaddam or mandal (B). Some sources suggest that the headman was chosen through the consensus of the village elders, and that this choice had to be ratified by the zamindar. Headmen held office as long as they enjoyed the confidence of the village elders, failing which they could be dismissed by them. The chief function of the headman was to supervise the preparation of village accounts, assisted by the accountant or patwari (C) of the panchayat.