In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that tribunals would not take away the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts, and their decisions could be scrutinised by the Division bench of the High Courts?

L Chandra Kumar case Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd., Jiwan Kumar Lohia v. Durga Dutt Lohia All of the above

L Chandra Kumar case

The tribunals however are not meant to replace the Courts. This has been explained by the seven judge bench of the Supreme Court in L Chandra Kumar case where it was held that tribunals would not take away the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts, and their decisions could be scrutinised by the Division bench of the High Courts.