Roopa takes away a piece of jewellery from the showroom without purchasing it with the intention of showing it to her mother who was shopping in another part of the mall. She was accused of theft. She alleged that she was not aware of the fact that what she did was a crime punishable under IPC, 1860. The Court still held her guilty, because of the applicability of _____.

Ignorantia facti excusat Ignorantia Jures Non Excusat

The correct answer is Option (2) → Ignorantia facti excusat Ignorantia Jures Non Excusat