The correct answer is Option 4 - A, B, C and E
The correct statements are:
A) The king of Nepal accepted the demand for a new democratic constitution in 1990, in the wake of a strong pro-democracy movement.
B) In 2002, the king abolished the parliament and dismissed the government, thus ending even the limited democracy that existed in Nepal.
C) In April 2006, there were massive, country-wide, pro-democracy protests in Nepal.
E) Some sections in Nepal thought that a nominal monarchy was necessary for Nepal to retain its link with the past.
Correction in the incorrect statement:
D) The struggle for democracy in 2006 was a NON-VIOLENT MOVEMENT led by the Seven Party Alliance (SPA), the Maoists and social activists.
F) All the parties in the Seven Party Alliance (SPA) DID NOT agree with the Maoists to include the radical programmes of social and economic restructuring in the constitution.
Nepal was a Hindu kingdom in the past and then a constitutional monarchy in the modern period for many years. Throughout this period, political parties and the common people of Nepal have wanted a more open and responsive system of government. But the king, with the help of the army, retained full control over the government and restricted the expansion of democracy in Nepal. The king accepted the demand for a new democratic constitution in 1990, in the wake of a strong pro-democracy movement. However, democratic governments had a short and troubled career. For some time, there was a triangular conflict among the monarchist forces, the democrats and the Maoists. In 2002, the king abolished the parliament and dismissed the government, thus ending even the limited democracy that existed in Nepal.
In April 2006, there were massive, country-wide, pro-democracy protest. The struggling pro-democracy forces achieved their first major victory when the king was forced to restore the House of Representatives that had been dissolved in April 2002. The largely non-violent movement was led by the Seven Party Alliance (SPA), the Maoists and social activists. Nepal's transition to democracy is almost complete. Nepal has undergone a unique moment in its history because it formed a constituent assembly to draft the constitution for Nepal. Some sections in Nepal thought that a nominal monarchy was necessary for Nepal to retain its link with the past. The Maoist groups agreed to suspend armed struggle. They wanted the constitution to include the radical programmes of social and economic restructuring. All the parties in the SPA did not agree with this programme. The Maoists and some other political groups were also deeply suspicious of the Indian government and its role in the future of Nepal. In 2008, Nepal became a democratic republic after abolishing the monarchy. In 2015, it adopted a new constitution.
|
