The Buddha's disciples hailed from diverse social strata. This encompassed not only kings, affluent individuals, and gahapatis (householders), but also those from more modest backgrounds: laborers, slaves, and artisans. Upon entering the sangha, all individuals shed their former social roles to be regarded as equals, unified under the titles of bhikkhus and bhikkhunis. The inner workings of the sangha were modeled after the traditions of ganas and sanghas, where consensus was achieved through deliberations. Should consensus prove elusive, decisions were made by casting votes on the matter.

What was the alternative approach if consensus could not be achieved through discussions?

Making decisions through voting

The Buddha's disciples hailed from diverse social strata. This encompassed not only kings, affluent individuals, and gahapatis (householders), but also those from more modest backgrounds: laborers, slaves, and artisans. Upon entering the sangha, all individuals shed their former social roles to be regarded as equals, unified under the titles of bhikkhus and bhikkhunis. The inner workings of the sangha were modeled after the traditions of ganas and sanghas, where consensus was achieved through deliberations. Should consensus prove elusive, decisions were made by casting votes on the matter.