Which of the following statements are correct about the 'Fifth Report?
A. It was submitted to the British Parliament in 1813.
B. It was a report on the administration and activities of the English East India Company in India.
C. It led to intense parliamentary debates on the nature of the English East India Company rule in India.
D. The report was prepared by Governor General Warren Hastings.
E. The report does not provide any insight into the land-revenue settlement under colonial rule.

Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
1. B, C, E only
2. C, D, E only
3. A, B, C only
4. A, C, E only

3

The correct answer is: 3. A, B, C only

Explanation:
A. Correct - The Fifth Report was submitted to the British Parliament in 1813.
B. Correct - It was a report on the administration and activities of the English East India Company in India.
C. Correct - It led to intense parliamentary debates on the nature of the English East India Company rule in India.
D. Incorrect - The report was not prepared by Governor General Warren Hastings. It is a famous document prepared by a Select Committee set up in 1810
E. Incorrect - The report does provide insight into the land-revenue settlement under colonial rule.

Many of the changes that occured in the Brtish India were documented in detail in a report that was submitted to the British Parliament in 1813. It was the fifth of a series of reports on the administration and activities of the East India Company in India. Often referred to as the Fifth Report, it ran into 1002 pages, of which over 800 pages were appendices that reproduced petitions of zamindars and ryots, reports of collectors from different districts, statistical tables on revenue returns, and notes on the revenue and judicial administration of Bengal and Madras (present-day Tamil Nadu) written by officials. From the time the Company established its rule in Bengal in the mid-1760s, its activities were closely watched and debated in England. There were many groups in Britain who were opposed to the monopoly that the East India Company had over trade with India and China. These groups wanted a revocation of the Royal Charter that gave the Company this monopoly. An increasing number of private traders wanted a share in the India trade, and the industrialists of Britain were keen to open up the Indian market for British manufactures. Many political groups argued that the conquest of Bengal was benefiting only the East India Company but not the British nation as a whole. Information about Company misrule and maladministration was hotly debated in Britain and incidents of the greed and corruption of Company officials were widely publicised in the press. The British Parliament passed a series of Acts in the late eighteenth century to regulate and control Company rule in India. It forced the Company to produce regular reports on the administration of India and appointed committees to enquire into the affairs of the Company. The Fifth Report was one such report produced by a Select Committee. It became the basis of intense parliamentary debates on the nature of the East India Company’s rule in India. For over a century and a half, the Fifth Report has shaped our conception of what happened in rural Bengal in the late eighteenth century. The evidence contained in the Fifth Report is invaluable. But official reports like this have to be read carefully. We need to know who wrote the reports and why they were written. In fact, recent researches show that the arguments and evidence offered by the Fifth Report cannot be accepted uncritically. Researchers have carefully examined the archives of various Bengal zamindars and the local records of the districts to write about the history of colonial rule in rural Bengal. They indicate that, intent on criticising the maladministration of the company, the Fifth Report exaggerated the collapse of traditional zamindari power, as also overestimated the scale on which zamindars were losing their land. As we have seen, even when zamindaris were auctioned, zamindars were not always displaced, given the ingenious methods they used to retain their zamindaris.