Practicing Success
Assertion: Therapeutic alliance is contractual in nature. |
Both Assertion (A) and reasoning (R) are correct and R is the correct explanation of A. Both Assertion (A) and reasoning (R) are correct and but R is not correct explanation of A. Assertion (A) is true but Reasoning (R) is not Correct Assertion (A) is false but Reasoning (R) is true. |
Both Assertion (A) and reasoning (R) are correct and R is the correct explanation of A. |
The best answer is: ☀ Both Assertion (A) and reasoning (R) are correct and R is the correct explanation of A. Here's why:
In conclusion, both the assertion and reasoning are true, and the reasoning directly explains the contractual nature of the therapeutic alliance. "The special relationship between the client and the therapist is known as the therapeutic relationship or alliance. It is neither a passing acquaintance, nor a permanent and lasting relationship. There are two major components of a therapeutic alliance. The first component is the contractual nature of the relationship in which two willing individuals, the client and the therapist, enter into a partnership which aims at helping the client overcome her/his problems. The second component of therapeutic alliance is the limited duration of the therapy. This alliance lasts until the client becomes able to deal with her/his problems and take control of her/ his life. This relationship has several unique properties. It is a trusting and confiding relationship." |