Identify the wrong pair from the following options.
Answer & explanation
Correct answer: option 3
The correct answer is Option (3) → Sadr-us-Sudur - Army Commander
The question asks for the pair that is wrongly matched, so each pair is checked.
Option (1) Zat - position in the imperial hierarchy. — Correct statement. Every holder of a government office held a rank (mansab) with two numbers; zat was an indicator of position in the imperial hierarchy and of the salary of the mansabdar.
Option (2) Sawar - number of horsemen to be maintained by each mansabdar. — Correct statement. The second number, sawar, indicated the number of horsemen the mansabdar was required to maintain in service.
Option (3) Sadr-us-Sudur - Army Commander — Incorrect statement. The sadr-us sudur was not an army commander. He was the minister of grants (madad-i maash) and was in charge of appointing local judges or qazis.
Option (4) Diwan-i-Ala - Finance Minister — Correct statement. The diwan-i ala was the finance minister, one of the important ministers at the centre beside the mir bakhshi and the sadr-us sudur.
Note: This question is taken from the chapter ‘Kings and Chronicles’ which was there in the pre-rationalised NCERT and has been deleted from subsequent editions of NCERT, including the NCERT book (2026-27).
NCERT (Pre-rationalised): “8.1 Recruitment and rank … All holders of government offices held ranks (mansabs) comprising two numerical designations: zat which was an indicator of position in the imperial hierarchy and the salary of the official (mansabdar), and sawar which indicated the number of horsemen he was required to maintain in service.… …The mir bakhshi (paymaster general) stood in open court on the right of the emperor and presented all candidates for appointment or promotion, while his office prepared orders bearing his seal and signature as well as those of the emperor. There were two other important ministers at the centre: the diwan-i ala … (finance minister) and sadr-us sudur (minister of grants or madad-i maash, and in charge of appointing local judges or qazis). The three ministers occasionally came together as an advisory body, but were independent of each other.…” |